>> Please consider apologizing for the unfounded assumptions and fatuous
silliness
> in both.
Unfounded assumption? You call a 10-year study on heterosexual
infectivity
entered under PUBMED an "unfounded assumption"?
Jorge, you have never had anything intelligent to offer, yet. You have a
personal ax to grind, nothing more.
The software has no built-in modeling assumptions- it is prepared to
model on any set of data or assumptions that your illustrious profession
can throw at it- fixed infectivity rates, variable rates, anything.
I defy you to try to offer any serious criticism of software, or
supply any alternative data of your own. That isn't your style-
you call names like an infant.
Tom Keske
