No Tom, that just where a "real" scientist would start and he or she would
effectively ask you to prove it before accepting.
I know you will necver have the gall to parade yourself as objective or
unbiased (tho' I see you have sufficient galle to parade yourself as
knowledgeable on this subject).
"By far the most likely explanation" does not constitute proof. By far the
most likely explanation for your postins is that you are totaly insane and
ignorant yet few would accept your ravings as proof.
But we are impressed with your ravings, please carry on to our general
amusement.
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy