Once again, this is subject to the interpretation of the individual. To
me, it is an acellular biological entity. I am much more interested in
the pathogenic properties of this phenomenon than its status as a
"living" thing.
Joe
On Tue, 13 May 1997 bernie at whidbey.not wrote:
> ...alive?
>> Or does this depend on how you define life?
> --
> Clever Hands
> (The ".not" is a ".net" not a ".not")
> Blessed are the weak for without them the strong would starve.
>>
