Problems with Pseudomonas putida minipreps

Peter Holubar holubar at mail.boku.ac.at
Sun Sep 24 11:54:39 EST 1995

J.D.Brinck at bham.ac.uk (Jason Brinck) wrote:

>I routinely grow a strain of Pseudomonas putida, which contains a recombinant 
>plasmid, as a continuous culture. I am trying to analyse plasmid DNA isolated 
>from samples taken at different time points during the experiment.
> As well as observing if the size of the plasmid remains unchanged I would 
>also like to see if the intracellular concentration of plasmid varies. In an 
>attempt to do this I have harvested equal amounts of cells at each sample (the 
>equivalent of 1ml of O.D. 2 culture) which I then store at -20 C as a 
>dry pellet. At the end of the experiment plasmid DNA is isolated from all 
>the samples using a standard miniprep protocol.
>The problem I have encountered is a complete lack of consistancy / 
>reproducability. The amount of plasmid DNA I recover from minipreps is highly 
>variable, even between duplicate samples. Also, the quality of DNA obtained is 
>often poor such that when I try to linearise the plasmid with HindIII a lot of 
>the samples only partly cut.


I don´t know the size of your plasmide, but I once had similar problems 
with a large plasmide in pseudomonads. Large plasmides are often strongly 
associated to the cell wall, so conventional minipreps would not lead to 
sufficient yield of plasmide. Maybe a solution is to digest your cells 
with proteinase K for a longer time than mentioned in the standard 

Peter Holubar
Institute of Applied Microbiology
Vienna, Austria
holubar at mail.boku.ac.at

More information about the Microbio mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net