greg at franklin.burnham-inst.org (Dr. Greg Quinn) wrote on 21 Apr 1999:
> I'm seeing some problems with W2H coupled with the use of GCG
> version 10; we're maxing out on RAM/swap with FASTA searches (set
> single processor on a two processor box), which I've never seen
> before. Just happening to me? G.
This is not happening to us. But I did notice this.
Running with GCGMaxProcessors set to 1, I get ave cpu usage > 100%
with fasta from the GCG10 command line and W2H. Also, FATSA seems
to default to GCGMaxProcessors even if you set -proc=n on the
command line. Strange.
When I run GCG blast and set GCGMaxProcessors to 1 I get cpu
averages < 100% and the -proc=n flag seems to work correctly.
The fasta thing happens outside of GCG with fasta3.X -T 1 giving me
cpu averages > 100%.
Don't know if it's DEC related or FASTA related.
Chris
______
Christopher W Botka Phone: (415)476-5379
Sequence Analysis Consulting Service Fax: (415)502-1755
UCSF Computer Graphics Lab Office: Lib-111
Internet: botka at cgl.ucsf.edu Mail Drop: Box 0446
http://www.sacs.ucsf.edu/ NeXT/MIME mail OK
