[...Also posted to help at gcg.com...]
In article <5mfc74$66t at netnews.upenn.edu>,
ellis at vesicle.dental.upenn.edu (Ellis Golub) writes:
[...] . . . . .
> 151 AGNVRSYARMDIGTTHDDYANDVVARAQYYKQHGY............... 185
> |
> 1 .................................GASARLLRAAIMGAPGS 17
> .
[...]
I saw such strange things using GCG9 gap, but had not time
to work around to see what's happen. I think there is a bug (big one)
in GCG9 gap. Also, that was with other sequences (but I can't
remember which ones!!!).
Could Oxford Molecular (Ooooooops, sorry) GCG look around this
problem?
Francois.
--
Francois Jeanmougin | groupe de bioinformatique / bioinformatics groupe
tel:(+33) 3 88 65 32 71 | IGBMC BP 163 67404 Illkirch France
e-mail : jeanmougin at igbmc.u-strasbg.fr
"C'est pas parcequ'on monte au banc, qu'il faut descendre a jeun."(Thiefaine)
