GCG V. 9.0-GAP
Ellis Golub
ellis at vesicle.dental.upenn.edu
Tue May 27 14:21:08 EST 1997
I guess it depends on which result you consider more useful:
ID LYG_ANSAN STANDARD; PRT; 185 AA.
AC P00718;
DT 21-JUL-1986 (REL. 01, CREATED)
DT 21-JUL-1986 (REL. 01, LAST SEQUENCE UPDATE)
DT 01-FEB-1996 (REL. 33, LAST ANNOTATION UPDATE)
DE LYSOZYME G (EC 3.2.1.17) (1,4-BETA-N-ACETYLMURAMIDASE) (GOOSE-TYPE . . .
to: kad3_bovin check: 1291 from: 1 to: 226
ID KAD3_BOVIN STANDARD; PRT; 226 AA.
AC P08760;
DT 01-NOV-1988 (REL. 09, CREATED)
DT 01-APR-1990 (REL. 14, LAST SEQUENCE UPDATE)
DT 01-NOV-1995 (REL. 32, LAST ANNOTATION UPDATE)
DE GTP:AMP PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE MITOCHONDRIAL (EC 2.7.4.10) (AK3). . . .
Symbol comparison table: . .gcg90/gcgcore/data/rundata/blosum62.cmp CompCheck: 6430
Gap Weight: 5 Average Match: 2.912
Length Weight: 3 Average Mismatch: -2.003
Quality: 4 Length: 409
Ratio: 0.022 Gaps: 0
Percent Similarity: 50.000 Percent Identity: 50.000
Match display thresholds for the alignment(s):
| = IDENTITY
: = 2
. = 1
lyg_ansan x kad3_bovin May 26, 1997 20:47 ..
.
.
.
. . . . .
151 AGNVRSYARMDIGTTHDDYANDVVARAQYYKQHGY............... 185
|
1 .................................GASARLLRAAIMGAPGS 17
.
.
OR .
Symbol comparison table: . .gcg90/gcgcore/data/moredata/oldpep.cmp
CompCheck: 2543
Gap Weight: 5 Average Match: 5.402
Length Weight: 3 Average Mismatch: -3.964
Quality: 829 Length: 244
Ratio: 4.481 Gaps: 35
Percent Similarity: 64.072 Percent Identity: 31.737
Match display thresholds for the alignment(s):
| = IDENTITY
: = 4
. = 1
lyg_ansan x kad3_bovin May 26, 1997 20:58 ..
. . . . .
1 .......RTDCYGNVNRIDTTGASCKTAKP.EGLSYCGVSASKKIAERD. 41
|:.. |..:. .:| .|::.:|. | |.. :| | .: ||
1 GASARLLRAAIMGAPGSGKGT.VSSRITKHFE.LKH..LS.SGDLL.RDN 44
. . . . .
42 .LQA..MDRY.KTIIKKVGEKLCVEPAVIAGIISRESHAGKVLKN..GWG 85
|:: :: . ||:|.: | || :...|:: :: :| ||| .:
45 MLRGTEIGVLAKTFIDQ.G.KL.IPDDVMTRLVLHE......LKNLTQY. 84
. . . . .
86 DR.GNGF..GLMQVD..KRSHKPQG..TWNG..EV...HIT.....QGTT 118
:: :|| :| |.: .|:.: :: .:|. || ::| .|.:
85 NWLLDGFPRTLPQAEALDRAYQIDTVINLNVPFEVIKQRLTARWIHPGSG 134
. . . . .
119 .IL.INF..IKT..IQ....KKFPSWTKDQQ...LKGGISAYNAGAGNVR 155
:. |:| || |: ..:. :..|:. :| :.||:|.:: |
135 RVYNIEFNPPKTMGIDDLTGEPLVQREDDRPETVVK.RLKAYEAQTEPVL 183
. . . .
156 SYAR....MD.I.GT.THDDYANDVVARAQY.YKQHGY...... 185
.| | :: : || |:. ::: | | | ..|::
184 EYYRKKGVLETFSGTETNKIWPH.VYAFLQTKLPQRSQETSVTP 226
In article <5me8vi$ngj at rc1.vub.ac.be>, cgovaert at ulb.ac.be (Cedric Govaerts) writes:
|>
|>
|> But the renormalized matrix used by GCG 8 has no scientific value, because
|> a conserved Glycine is in fact different than a conserved Tryptophan..
|> Better use Blosum 62 or PAM 250 (not renormalized !!).
|>
|> Cedric Govaerts
|>
--
Ellis Golub Phone: (215) 898-4629
Biochemistry Department FAX: (215) 898-3695
University of Pennsylvania ellis at biochem.dental.upenn.edu
School of Dental Medicine
4001 Spruce Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6003
More information about the Info-gcg
mailing list
Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net