In article <5gqqgq$nvv at news.u-strasbg.fr> pingouin at crystal.u-strasbg.fr (Francois JEANMOUGIN) writes:
>In article <PMR.97Mar19161952 at unst.sanger.ac.uk>,
>pmr at sanger.ac.uk writes:
>> As far as I know, GCG only completed the SDK licence agreement a few
>> days ago. I first saw a copy on the same day as another site mailed me
>> to ask about how it affects EGCG, so I think I must have been one of
>> the first. [...]
>> The problem is that I can't understand why YOU, the EGCG maintainer,
> should be treated as any other GCG site. I understood in Heidelberg that
> EGCG is really a chance for GCG (and it was told to GCG that without
> EGCG, we will not use GCG, or not the same way).
But EGCG *is* getting special treatment. There will be a special SDK
to allow distribution of EGCG. The first one I saw was an amended
version, with the additions marked (I assume there were no deletions :-)
to allow distribution of EGCG. GCG were in contact about this well
before the SDK actually appeared.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Rice | Informatics Division,
E-mail: pmr at sanger.ac.uk | The Sanger Centre,
Tel: (44) 1223 494967 | Wellcome Trust Genome Campus,
Fax: (44) 1223 494919 | Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA,
URL: http://www.sanger.ac.uk/~pmr/ | England
