In article <338C4FCC.41C6 at gcg.com>, Irv Edelman <edelman at gcg.com> wrote:
> Francois JEANMOUGIN wrote:
> >
> > [...Also posted to help at gcg.com...]
> > In article <5mfc74$66t at netnews.upenn.edu>,
> > ellis at vesicle.dental.upenn.edu (Ellis Golub) writes:
> > [...] . . . . .
> > > 151 AGNVRSYARMDIGTTHDDYANDVVARAQYYKQHGY............... 185
> > > |
> > > 1 .................................GASARLLRAAIMGAPGS 17
> > > .
> > [...]
> >
> > I saw such strange things using GCG9 gap, but had not time
> > to work around to see what's happen. I think there is a bug (big one)
> > in GCG9 gap. Also, that was with other sequences (but I can't
> > remember which ones!!!).
> > Could Oxford Molecular (Ooooooops, sorry) GCG look around this
> > problem?
>> The two sequences being aligned here (sw:lyg_ansan and sw:kad3_bovin)
> share no significant similarity.
To add to what Irv said, try having a look at these two sequences with a
dotplot program and you'll see that these two seqs bear little relation to
each other.
--
Michael Mitchell "Smoke me a kipper,
User Support I'll be back for breakfast."
Molecular Biology Software Ace Rimmer, Test Pilot
+44 (0)171 269 3115 BBC-TV Red Dwarf ENFJ
