Peter Rice (pmr at sanger.ac.uk) wrote:
: As for batches, aliases, and other tricks - experience in developing
: EGCG 8.0 leaves me astonished that you find it easier on Unix.
Well, I think that both got their advantages. UNIX is surely better for
one-liners and a reasonable script should count more non-alphanumeric
keys than 0-1 and Aa-Zz.
The real pain for the user support is the teaching. We have been doing
all three variants - VMS only, UNIX only, VMS and UNIX simultaneously
and the real problems are system-dependent such as 'I stored my files
in WPI and don't know the name. I have only 3000 files in this directory
and I want to add it to the main list window.'
THEN you start the philosophy of operating systems. Within GCG, for the
end-user it doesn't matter that much any longer.
For the GCG developer the story is even more tricky. Besides the already-
mentioned SUN problems I haven't made it yet on AIX either, due to the
fact that the GCG 'wpiwm' program has unresolved symbols in the shell.
We need to recompile - and noticed after having received the FORTAN
compiler license that the FORTRAN PREPROCESSOR is separately licensed, too.
My concern is that the current zoo of to-be-supported operating systems
keeps growing, and makes it nearly impossible to offer good software for
all platforms as they diverge so much. (Did I hear someone wants it for
R.Doelz Klingelbergstr.70| Tel. x41 61 267 2247 Fax x41 61 267 2078|
Biocomputing CH 4056 Basel| electronic Mail doelz at ubaclu.unibas.ch|
Biozentrum der Universitaet Basel|-------------- Switzerland ---------------|
<a href=http://beta.embnet.unibas.ch/>EMBnet Switzerland:info at ch.embnet.org</a>