In article <41lgjh$e36 at decaxp.harvard.edu>, tshin at fas.harvard.edu (Tae Bum
Shin) wrote:
-> Hi there;
-> Our research group has been using GCG-Unix for the past few
-> years, and personally I have _no_ complaints about its features or
-> power. However, some of my more faint-hearted colleagues complain about
-> the UNIX interface and have inquired about the possibility of a Macintosh
-> package which would replace GCG. My question to you is this: are there
-> any Mac genetic software packages that are comparable in their feature
-> sets to GCG? On the other hand, do any of these Mac packages offer
-> _unique_ features not found in GCG? Thanks for you input, and if there
-> enough answers I'll post a summary later.
->
Look into MacVector. I don't contact info at this moment, but if you
email me, I can get it for you. It is not quite as robust as GCG, but it
is far more intuitive (as most Mac programs tend to be). I have not used
either to any large degree (as my work doesn't require it), but if I had
to do something in that regard, I'd certainly go to MacVector first.
regards,
Enrico Cantu
Dept. of Biochemical & Biophysical Sciences
University of Houston
