In article <7kvigo$915$1 at scotsman.ed.ac.uk>, chrisb at hgu.mrc.ac.uk (Chris
Boyd) wrote:
>Not nearly as fast as typing, nor nearly as accurate. I fail to see
>how speech recognition can be an improvement over typing for this
>simple application. In general, using speech recognition as the
>user/computer interface might have short-term benefits,
<snip>
Strikes me that a better solution might be to use a scanner and write a
macro for NIH-Image to track automagically. Of course, you then have the
problem of resolving bands that are close together, or bendy, but you get
that manually anyway.
Comments?
--
Richard P. Grant MA DPhil | rgrant at cmtech.co.uk
work: www.cmtech.co.uk | home: www.avnet.co.uk/adastra
-- Minipreps 'R' Us --
