In article <slrn769hbf.4jb.aiyar at ebv.oncology.wisc.edu>,
aiyar at ebv.oncology.wisc.edu (Ashok Aiyar) writes:
> Perhaps you have encountered a Mac-specific bug in clustalw-1.74. BTW,
> have you tried this with clustalx?
In fact it is the same algorithm, so it should give the same result.
Using ClustalX would help finding the good matrix. In such a case, it
is also usefull to log the process in a log file.
If Bernard could send me both input and output file, I could have a
look at what really happen in Clustal. The difference in length is a
known problem that we are trying to work around, as described in the
recent TiBS computer corner.
François.
--
François Jeanmougin | groupe de bioinformatique / bioinformatics groupe
tel:(+33) 3 88 65 32 71 | IGBMC BP 163 67404 Illkirch France
