Ref PC' or Macs

Tom Chappell t.chappell at ucl.ac.uk
Wed Dec 17 09:25:48 EST 1997

In article <677a3v$qb5$1 at cronkite.lanminds.com>, "John Monahan"
<monahan at avigen.com> wrote:

>Dont know about the percentages. What does it matter. This is the late 90's,
>PC's are are on at least 95% of desktops out there. Current software is
>converging towards W95/NT/DCOM/ActiveX/Java. The Mac blip has passed, lets
>move on!


I'm interested in your   W95/NT/DCOM/ActiveX/Java replacements for the
following Mac programs:

1) Gene Construction Kit --I know major drug companies that have failed in
their "no Macs" attempts over this one.
2) CELLQuest -- BD is the major supplier of  flow cytometry hardware,
software and reagents in the world--Mac hardware and software... 
3) Sequencer  and ABI instrument control -- virtually all DNA sequence in
the world is initially called with a Mac--and then goes to either Macs
(low volume work) or UNIX (high volume work)...

I'm willing to be converted, but I use GCK everyday, and have found
nothing even close available for Windows. As a minor starting point, GCK
is capable of searching my hard disk for DNA sequences, with matches based
on DNA matching rules.

I use Windows for microscope control and chromatography automation, but it
is just not anywhere close on Molecular Biology tools.

Tom Chappell
MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology
University College London

More information about the Bio-soft mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net