Solaris 2.x on a Pentium? + UW SCSI disk prob

drhawley drhawley at concentric.net
Sat Apr 26 21:26:46 EST 1997

I have to agree with Steve.  I've been on Pentium X86 for
two years and I'm as happy as a pig in mud.  My main reason
to be honest is selfish, IMHO Solaris contracts pay bigger
bucks and are more redily available. :-)

I'm so happy with Solaris x86 I'm putting together system #2. :-)

If anyone has delt with Ultra/Wide IBM SCSI disks under
Solaris x86 2.5.1 please read my posting on comp.sys.sun.admin.
I need some help with SCSI ids over 7.

Regards, David

Steve Cole wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 1997, Jennifer Steinbachs wrote:
> > Solaris 2.5 x86 may be stable, but Linux (esp. RedHat) is much
> > more stable, has much more documentation, and is FREE :)
> Horsepucks!  Show me the UNIX manuals for Linux, and I don't mean the
> online ones! Show me more than a half dozen 4+ processor Linux boxes that
> have been up more than 90 days under fairly extreme mission-critial use.
> There's thousands of Sun boxes with those stats - hell, the Pentium Pro
> has hardly been out long enough to try to prove your point, and neither
> has Linux 2.x.
> Cheers,
> Steve      |President & Systems Administrator,  Kingston Online Services
>            |(e pluribus unix)    Multiple-T1    URL: http://www.kos.net/
>            |Business and Education partners in SouthEastern Ontario
>            |
>            |"Through the firewall, out the router, down the T1, across the
>            |backbone, bounced from satellite, it's nothing but net."
>            |(forgive me if I'm terse, I answer hundreds of e-mails a day)

More information about the Bio-soft mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net