Tim
Sorry for the garbage post; it's what happens if you read a newsgroup at
7:00AM and post. I read 'GCG' for gcc (I think it was the case that threw
me).
Peter Rice (pmr at sanger.ac.uk) wrote:
:jquinn at best.com (Greg) writes:
: > Tim Cutts (tjrc1 at mole.bio.cam.ac.uk) wrote:
: > : In some cases even a binary gcc distribution is not enough; you can't
: > : use gcc on an IRIX box unless you've bought the Development Option
: > : anyway, because you won't have the header files. :-/
: >
: > I have set up GCG on an IRIX box that doesn't have the development option
: > installed; why would you need headers with a binary distribution?
: Oops. Had to happen.
: GCG is the GCG Inc. Wisconsin Sequence Analysis Package, which started
: this thread.
: gcc is the GNU C compiler.
: As for the related question "why would you need headers with a binary
: GCG distribution?" ...
: .. So you could link your own code to the GCG object libraries.
: --
: ------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Peter Rice | Informatics Division,
: E-mail: pmr at sanger.ac.uk | The Sanger Centre,
: Tel: (44) 1223 494967 | Wellcome Trust Genome Campus,
: Fax: (44) 1223 494919 | Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA,
: URL: http://www.sanger.ac.uk/~pmr/ | England
