Andreas.Brune at uni-konstanz.de (Andreas Brune) writes:
>In article <3tlh0e$ks4 at metro.ucc.su.OZ.AU>,
>sfletche at extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU (Stephen Fletcher) wrote:
>>.......
>>I checked
>>out Tim Cutts Refs, and found the windows too
>>small to read anything in, I like to be able to
>>see a decent amount to read on the screen, and
>>Refs windows are not sizeable.
>>........
>Apparently you didn't check properly? ALL windows in Refs are
>sizeable by standard windows controls.
>Please be more careful to do justice to the author before you post an
>evaluation of a (shareware) program. Many others might base their
>decision on your criticism.
Thanks, Andreas. :-)
>I'm using Refs since it's 'early days', and a lot of functionality has
>been added since then, always without additional charge to registered
>users. Again, a new version is in the make, and it is supposed to be
>completely rewritten to run also under OS/2 and Windows95/NT (visit
>Tim's home page at "http://cyclin.zoo.cam.ac.uk/refs/refs.html"for>details).
This is not quite true. I am currently preparing Refs such that ports
to Windows 95 and/or NT and/or OS/2 will be much easier to do. That
isn't to say that I've started on the ports!!! There will be at least
one more purely Win16 version before I start on any 32 bit version.
Regards,
Tim.
PS... sorry for the post about my own software, but I just wanted to
set the record straight slightly.
