On 23 Nov 1994, Cornelius Krasel wrote:
> Peter Lundberg (peterl at umdix.umdc.umu.se) wrote:
> > I like Cricket Graph III, but then I haven't really tried anything else
> > (except Deltagraph, which I gave up pretty quickly).
>> > So what's better, and what is bad in CGIII?
>> The old Cricket Graph versions were IMHO much more user friendly; the new
> CGIII hasn't many improvements except the clumsier user interface.
>
CGIII is clunkier to use, but it does permit moderately sophisticated
importing of data, which the old ver. didn't.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel M. Weinreich email: dmw at mcz.harvard.edu
Harvard University usmail: 26 Oxford Street
Museum of Comparative Zoology Cambridge, MA 02138
voice: (617) 495-1954 fax: (617) 495-5667
-------------------------------------------------------------------
