Peter Lundberg (peterl at umdix.umdc.umu.se) wrote:
> I like Cricket Graph III, but then I haven't really tried anything else
> (except Deltagraph, which I gave up pretty quickly).
> So what's better, and what is bad in CGIII?
The old Cricket Graph versions were IMHO much more user friendly; the new
CGIII hasn't many improvements except the clumsier user interface.
I prefer Kaleidagraph (not for the user interface but for the powerful
curve fitter).
--Cornelius.
--
/* Cornelius Krasel, Abt. Lohse, Genzentrum, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany */
/* email: krasel at alf.biochem.mpg.de fax: +49 89 8578 3795 */
/* "Science is the game you play with God to find out what His rules are." */
