what software do biologists need?

S S Sturrock sss at castle.ed.ac.uk
Thu Mar 18 11:02:59 EST 1993

In article <1993Mar18.133814.77722 at embl-heidelberg.de> omond at embl-heidelberg.de (Roy Omond) writes:
>In article <33147 at castle.ed.ac.uk>, sss at castle.ed.ac.uk (S S Sturrock) writes:

#> updates.  This from a machine that costs *FAR* less than the MasPar.  Sure,
#                                                               ^^^^^^
#Presume you meant the CM-200 !

Just checking you were paying attention :-)
#> cell updates for proteins and 285 million for nucleic acid (4K PEs) scaling
#> perfectly across all maspar machines (1-16K PEs).  Ah the power of mips V
#> flops!
#Hear hear, Shane !

Thankyou, thankyou, luvvies, smarm (read in best Sir Dickie A. tone of voice)

#Just a small nitpick.  For most of the world, that should be :
# Blitz at EMBL-Heidelberg.DE
#(*sigh*... ze British !)

Ah but we drive on the left remember :-)

#Real soon now :-)  Problem was/is manpower within EMBL;  Peter Rice has
#agreed to help out with the DNA stuff.

Goodoh, got some pretty exciting things up my sleeve for this baby.

#Re Civilisation:  Agreed !!!


Shane Sturrock, Biocomputing Research Unit, Darwin Building, Mayfield Road,
University of Edinburgh, Scotland, Commonwealth of Independent Kingdoms.  :-)

Civilisation is a Haggis Supper with salt and sauce and a bottle of Irn Bru.

More information about the Bio-soft mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net