Help in selecting a workstation.

Ernest Retzel 1535 49118 ernest at lenti.med.umn.edu
Tue Mar 16 02:01:23 EST 1993

I was going to just stay out of this one and let it go with a private answer
[which I already gave].  But with only two answers being NeXT and SGI, I just
have to...sigh.

There are really only three workstations to talk about--Sun, HP and SGI.
Sun and HP own something in excess of 80% of the market.  We use a combination
of primarily Sun, with a smattering of SGI for graphics, and a couple of NeXT's
[including the one I have at home].  Suns are used for the bulk of the work and
for general purpose workstations; they have excellent price-performance [at
the lowend, a machine for about $2500].  They are easy to use and to set up.
There is software available for them, both commercial and PD.  They are cheap
to maintain and just keep on working [every machine we ever bought is still out
there chugging, somewhere].  Most general purpose development gets done on them
first, and ported to other things.  SGIs are excellent graphics engines; they
are expensive to maintain; software for them is hard to find; they don't like
to integrate with other systems easily.  Graphics and SciVis sw goes there
first, and frequently stays there.  HP's are fine machines and very fast.
They own a big piece of the market, but you will have a hard time finding an
HP guru, particularly around a campus.  And you will need one.  NeXT's are
nice, but I don't think I would want to try to batter GenBank with one.  I have
a hard time finding software for it in general, and don't think that will
change unless they get picked up as part of one of the other workstation
environments [HP or Sun].  NeXTStep/Intel will make a good meld.

There is really more to choosing a system than which one is fastest today.

All standard disclaimers regarding the companies mentioned.

Ernie Retzel
ernest at lenti.med.umn.edu

More information about the Bio-soft mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net