In article <28SEP199211032524 at seqvax.caltech.edu> mathog at seqvax.caltech.edu (David Mathog) writes:
>>[complaint about loss of FASTA server]
>>Ex Genbank-FASTA users need to replace this service, and soon (ie,
>TOMORROW). Speaking as a US taxpayer, I'd say that it would make a bit more
>sense for the NCBI to scrape up the money to get that FASTA server back on
>line than it does for the NIH/NSF to spend many times that amount putting
>new hardware in (50?) sites like mine! I don't have the figures, but you
>folks have a budget of what, >1M$/year? I just do NOT believe that the NCBI
>does not have the resources to put together a FASTA server.
> Hear Hear! I wanted to say this, but didn't think I was in much of a
position to complain. But as long as others are complaining. I bet there
are _many_ people who would also make this complaint.
This article is for entertainment purposes only. Any facts, opinions,
narratives or ideas contained herein are not necessarily true, and do
not necessarily represent the views of any particular person.