In article <1992Sep2.015528.21973 at midway.uchicago.edu>,
chh9 at quads.uchicago.edu (Conrad Halton Halling) wrote:
> I have discovered an inconsistent use of the "/codon_start=" qualifier in
> several EMBL entries.
> Is this something that will be corrected soon?
This is a known problem which stems from the time when - as you have
guessed - the definition of /codon_start was not exactly clear.
The correction of entries in which this qualifier is used incorrectly is
part of a major clean-up of the feature table which is currently under
progress and should be done before the next release.
EMBL Data Library
Fuchs at EMBL-Heidelberg.DE