To: Ulrich Melcher
I do not agree that ACTG is a poor choice. In my experience, there
has been no ambiguity in this matter. This is a long established
convention that would make all previous papers unnecessarily obsolete.
I would strongly encourage journal editors not to consider such
an unnecssary change. Poor quality printers can distort practically
any message. I suggest that those who have problems with ACTG should
improve the quality of their print output would would be beneficial
to all other printing. Eric Triplett, University of Wisconsin
