Nicolas,
> just curious about this: it appears that you cannot define your own
> class named ?Gene with acedb 4.9t
> this worked with an old 4.9g though
>> example:
> models.wrm contains only:
> ?Gene proteins Text
>> and bad.ace contains:
> Gene : "YWHAG"
> proteins "P35214"
>> parsing the ace file with 4.9t gives error: "missing model of class Gene"
> 4.9g eats it up fine, and replacing Gene with Gene1 in models and ace
> file works also with 4.9t
With the current development code this works and it should do, as far as I know
there is no list of reserved class names and if there is "Gene" should not be on it.
Something to watch out for (because I tripped over it ;-) is that I have a
subclass "Gene" defined in my test database which I didn't know about. You
should make sure you don't have one.
Its likely that behaviour of the code has changed because Simn tinkered around
in the subclass code when he was adding Composite classes:
http://www.acedb.org/winfo/Newsletters/Year2003/October.html#superclass
cheers Ed
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Ed Griffiths, Acedb development, Informatics Group, |
| Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, |
| Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK |
| |
| email: edgrif at sanger.ac.uk Tel: +44-1223-494780 Fax: +44-1223-494919 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
