IUBio

Ura3-52 deletion in Clontech strains

Sanford Silverman silvermans at pt.cyanamid.com
Tue Mar 25 20:41:57 EST 1997


Michael Lichten wrote:
> 
> In article <espinoza.859230092 at cgl.ucsf.edu>, espinoza at cgl.ucsf.edu
> (Hernan Espinoza) wrote:
> 
> > Albert Spielmann <Albert.spielmann at bota.unine.ch> writes:
> >
> > >I'm working with the two-hybrid system from Clontech.
> > >The yeast strains are CG1945 and Y190. Both have a ura3-52 deletion.
> > >Normally they can't grow without uracil. But as said in the supplier's
> > >protocol, it must grow!! Why?
> >
> >         Your question is a bit ambiguous, under what conditions must the
> > strains grow?  I'm not familiar with the Clonetech system, but I would
> > wager it's to select for a URA3 marker on a plasmid...
> >
> >         -Hernan
> 
> Let's clear up a misconception right now.  ura3-52 is NOT a deletion; it's
> a Ty insertion in the URA3 coding region.
> 
> --
> Michael Lichten
> lichten at helix.nih.gov


These strains, as explained in the catalog, have URA+Gal-lacZ
constructions inserted into a chromosome.


-- 
Sanford Silverman               >Opinions expressed here are my own< 
American Cyanamid  
silvermans at pt.cyanamid.com                      "Yeast is Best"



More information about the Yeast mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net