IUBio Biosequences .. Software .. Molbio soft .. Network News .. FTP

Equity v. parity

Sabine Dippel S.Dippel at pfh.research.philips.com
Fri Jul 28 10:37:05 EST 2000

Janet Mertz wrote: 

> Another likely major factor is that whereas many men are willing to apply 
> nationwide to any job even vaguely matching their background and research 
> interests - i.e., apply to 50 or more jobs, women tend to be much more 
> selective, applying only to jobs that closely match their family needs 
> (e.g., location) and their specific research area. Thus, even among women 
> interested in tenure-track positions, they have pre-selected themselves out 
> of possible jobs so that even departments sincerely interested in hiring 
> women have a hard time identifying potential candidates. 
> Janet Mertz 

Yes and No. As far as applications go, this has been my experience, too, 
but I have also seen (in my job search and in that of other people) that 
men who apply to jobs that only remotely match their background have a 
fair chance to be hired nevertheless, whereas women only got the jobs 
that closely matched theirs (and weren't even interviewed for the other
ones in many cases). Selection committees are only too happy to reject 
a woman's application on the grounds that "her background is not exactly 
in the area we are looking for" (though I have only anecdotal evidence 
for this, it comes from someone who was part of such committees, so I know 
it has happened). 
Concerning the location dependence - well, sure, there we're back at the 
good old "two-body problem". 



More information about the Womenbio mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net