In article <A7DDB32371 at bio.tamu.edu>, JFRUGOLI at BIO.TAMU.EDU ("Julia
>>This tells me two things:
>>1) NIH thinks that <26K is not a reasonable wage, yet they pay that when
>they can get away with it.
>>>2) NIH considers people with PhDs and publications less valuable than
>people with MDs who are blurry on how to set up a good experiment.
>>I'm sure I've insulted all the MDs and half of NIH, so I'll go get my
>asbestos underwear, but I wanted to make the point that if we look at
>policy, it's not just "society" at large that doesn't value a research
>PhD-it's NIH itself!
>Julia-I had to fight in my inhouse postdoc at UT-Southwestern at Dallas to
get 26K/y. My dept had an interesting way to pay postdocs less than
that-use a preponderance of international postdocs. That way,it could get
MD's for 19-21K. For a time, I was the only US citizen postdoc in the
dept. I like to think the dept got their money's worth out of me, since I
have 7 original papers in print and two out for review from my time there.
<mailto:cjfuller at erickson.uncg.edu>
<mailto:cjfuller at mindspring.com>