> In article <1144809767.366060.150230 at u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>,
> "subberry" <zhangpy at gmail.com> wrote:
> >Thank you!
>> No good reason. In fact, we can.
I agree. At the very least many of them are ATPases. Of course, the
chaperone activity (unlike chaperonins) is not enzymatic, as no reaction
Unfortunately, no EC-number seems to have been assigned yet.