Aravind remove.this-aravind at charter.net
Sun Nov 30 11:42:42 EST 2003

Sorry, I meant to reply to some thread and not start a new message. I apologize.

Rolands G. Aravindan
rolands_aravindan at yahoo.com
  "Rolands Aravindan, Ph.D." wrote in message <3FC9C16E.13179.67353F at localhost>...
  >So wouldn't protein folding depend on the weather of this low

  >probability interacting electron "space", because these

  >interactions could shield or expose a "start" in a gravity

  >towards a particular fold ?


  >I then realised that the electrons are constantly moving so the

  >whole protein molecule is constantly dynamically moving anyway.

  >And therefore the major folding forces would come from this self

  >shake .

  Well, under the theoretical 'low probablility' interacting 'space', there is a state of equilibrium that is attained by forces that pull in various directions and there is a certain amount of stability achieved, given that nothing changes and temperature, pressure, etc., remain constant. However, in solution, the 'interactions' with the environment, eg., with molecules of water, can't be avoided.
  Rolands G. Aravindan
  rolands_aravindan at yahoo.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://iubio.bio.indiana.edu/bionet/mm/proteins/attachments/20031130/afeaf157/attachment.html

More information about the Proteins mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net