In article <1995Jan30.201542.18484 at alw.nih.gov>, johnk at spasm.niddk.nih.gov (John Kuszewski) writes:
> In article <3ggmdi$5j at mace.cc.purdue.edu>, barani at mace.cc.purdue.edu (Barani) writes:
>
>
> |> IMHO crystallographers are more closer to the truths
> |> of a biomolecule than anyone else.
>
> Except, of course, for us NMR people. No packing distotions,
> good pictures of flexibility.
>
And a residue limit of about 250AA even for 4D. NMR is always going to be a
technique of restricted use until larger biomolecules can be resolved.
Orhan.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Orhan W.D. Ertughrul | /\ "It's hard enough to watch
University of Cambridge | / \ /\ the news, let alone explain
Department of Biochemistry | / / \ it to a child to cast its
Tennis Court Road | / / \ eyes on nature over fields
Cambridge CB2 1QW |/ / \ of rape and corn, and tell
| /\/ \ it without flinching not to
owde100 at cus.cam.ac.uk | / \ \ fear where its been born"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
WWW : http://nirvana.bioc.cam.ac.uk/~owde100/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
