How about that recent paper in a well-known scientific journal that gives
irrefutably proof that all creationists are dyslexic victims of autoerotic
sexual abuse? The evidence is very convincing and sets a biblical precedent
based on old testament prophecy. There's no way you fanatical bible-thumpers
can argue with that. If you do, you will struck down dead and go straight to
MarcRW <marcRW at spam.me.not> wrote in message
news:TfXfb.14658$gi2.10512 at fed1read01...
> "jabriol" <jabriol at Neogenesis.net> wrote in message
> news:Q7Xfb.657523$Ji7.7122083 at news.easynews.com...>> > > >I am not a creationist, and I have posted recent articles, which has
> > > >been conviently ignored..
> > > >for example, new scientist article of plant evolution. it basicly
> > > >knowcks down all previous theories on plant evolution.
> > > >
> > > >where you criticism on that?
> > > >
> > > >the article is still hot off the press..
> > >
> > > Reference please.
> > http://www.nybg.org/pr/orchid_age.html> >
> > the above link, was not what I have in mind.. the article of new
> > is still on sale.. I will look for the date...
>> Why the refernce, then? I looked, and all it says is that they've made
> discoveries using DNA that correct and extend our understanding of the
> evolution, and distribution of orchids. It hardly "knocks down all
> theories on plant evolution".