IUBio Biosequences .. Software .. Molbio soft .. Network News .. FTP

newsgroup for cacti?

Cereoid* cereoid at prodigy.net
Wed Nov 7 17:39:59 EST 2001

That's my point. Why not go with the existing rec.gardens.cacti?

I see you have not done your homework either, Jorgen. At least you are a
cactophile with familiarity with what's already out there.

Are you a member of the CSSA? Do you get the journal?

Did you check out their home page, the Cacti_etc homepage or the Cactus

I have yet to read from anyone who has made the connections between the
three, especially Bruno (Psycho Cactus) himself. I'm not going to do it for
you guys.


Jorgen Grahn <jgrahn-nntp at algonet.se> wrote in message
news:slrn9uj1uu.h3.jgrahn-nntp at frailea.sa.invalid...
> [followup set]
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2001 08:48:46 -0000, Brian Watson
<brian at spheroid.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > "Cereoid*" <cereoid at prodigy.net> wrote in message
> > news:HS0G7.640$S61.105125961 at newssvr15.news.prodigy.com...
> ...
> >> Cacti_etc already
> >> serves as the official source for information
> >
> > Official? In what way "official"?
> I'd say it's "unofficially official" ;-)
> I agree with Cereoid about one thing: rec.gardens.cacti won't steal the
> audience from cacti_etc or the smaller, Yahoo-based mailing lists. If
> anything, it will be a place where you recruit new members to the list.
> That's how *I* found out about cacti_etc back in '95 -- by asking around
> Usenet.
> So let's just create the group properly and see what happens, shall we?
> /Jorgen
> --
>   // Jorgen Grahn <jgrahn@      ''Battle ye not with monsters,
> \X/                algonet.se>    lest ye become a monster''

More information about the Plantbio mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net