Hey, they were the ones that wanted me to stay, dude.
Its your little private kingdom not mine.
I'm surprised you still have any sponsors left.
Can't wait until you are the one paying a visit to Disneyland.
There will be thousands dancing in the streets
Spike Hernandez <webmaster at vmirror.com> wrote in message
news:3b701910.14810953 at news.bellatlantic.net...
> Still haven't lost that pleasant demeanor that so endeared you to our
> users. ;-)
>> Thanks for the help.
>> On Tue, 07 Aug 2001 15:51:53 GMT, "Cereoid*" <cereoid at prodigy.net>
>> >What, the creep that runs the Gardenweb doesn't know something?
> >Why not use your real name, Robert Stewart?
> >Plant family names correctly have the name of the type genus followed by
> >Its Asteraceae.
> >The old Jussieu family names, such as Compositae, are no longer accepted.
> >If those two horticultural books are your "principle authorities", you
> >using the wrong ones. Try botanical references instead.
> >Spike Hernandez <webmaster at vmirror.com> wrote in message
> >news:3b700aec.11190272 at news.bellatlantic.net...> >> Is there any meeting on the minds as to which is the proper name of
> >> the composite family, Compositae vs. Asteraceae ??
> >> "The Families of Flowering Plants", by L. Watson and M. J. Dallwit,
> >> uses Compositae.
> >> But the RHS "Index of Garden Plants" uses Asteraceae.
> >> And these are our two principal authorities. ;-)
> >> Any input would be appreciated.
> >> Thanks,
> >> Spike Hernandez