ABSORBU (absorbu at aol.com) wrote:
: A fungi called "mycorrhyzae".
No, there are *many* fungal taxa that could be considered mycorrhizal.
: A little known
This might be the case for those whom have never read anything
about plant biology. As this newsgroup is the "plant" stem ;)
of the bionet hierarchy, one would expect this not to be the case.
: family of fungi
Not really. Not in terms of taxonomy or systematics, albeit there
are some related species that may be classified as belonging to the
same family. Mycorrhizae refers to several kinds of fungal structure,
not taxonomic status. Some fungi 'behave' this way - that is,
producing particular structures, others 'behave' in other ways.
Two main forms of mycorrhizae are: Ectomycorrhizae, which, as the
prefix 'ecto-' suggests, form on the outer part of plant roots,
and Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhizae (often called 'VAM'), which form
by fungal hyphae (structurally analogous to fine root hairs or veins)
infiltrate the plant root structure.
: that inhabits the roots of nearly all of
: the world's plants is creating great interest in an increasing number of
: forestry, agriculture, horticulture and landscape professionals around
: the world.
Mycorrhizal research is not new, nor are the potential applications of
this research in the fields you mention. I would have little faith in
any 'professional' who lacked even fundamental knowledge on this.
: The fungi can be found, on every grain of sand and every gram of soil from
: the Arctic circle to the Equator
How can this be so, if what you wrote next is also true?
: First, inoculation of seedlings with the fungi promotes revegetation of
: sites such as strip mined lands and roadsides where natural fungus
: populations have been destroyed.
Just another perspective.