Una Smith (smith-una at edu.yale) wrote:
: I like bionet.plants, by the way. Perhaps you were miffed by the
: list of alteratives to bionet.plants that I gave, which you edited
: out of your reply? I should say I mentioned them as a rejoinder to
I'm glad you like it Una and I'm not easily miffed ;-)
I'm interested in any other botanical email/news groups that are
available and I didn't 'edit out' the alternatives you gave, I just put
the arbitron result in because it was of interest and relevant to
Jonathan's remarks about the PHOTOSYN subscribers reluctance to
subscribe to an 'active' group ...
: the original question about botanists not liking to use computers,
: not as "better" alternatives to bionet.plants. There are lots of
: us, but there are also lots of ways to spend any personal e-mail or
: Usenet quota, and we can't all be active here. Subscribe to all
: those mailing lists together, and you'll have more stuff in your
: mailbox than you can stand to read!
I really hate to drone on about this on bionet.plants again, but if you
pool your resources and subscribe _one_ user to the lists you are
interested in you can share them with all the other users at your site
*without* filling your mailbox or using up your quota!
Either use public mail folders, or use mail2news to post the articles
locally. You don't have to be a sysadm to do this (but it helps).
I'm reading this on my PC at home, in the evening, and you are right I
would have more stuff than I could stand to read *if* it was in my
mailbox. But, it isn't - it is in a shared news spool directory and I'm
reading it with "tin". The only user here who subscribes to BIOSCI is
news at rri.sari.ac.uk. Everyone else reads it selectively as news.
Dr. A.J.Travis, | JANET: <ajt at uk.ac.sari.rri>
Rowett Research Institute, | other: <ajt at rri.sari.ac.uk>
Greenburn Road, Bucksburn, | phone: +44 (0)224 712751
Aberdeen, AB2 9SB. UK. | fax: +44 (0)224 715349