> Could Immune Evolution Put A Cap On Vertebrate Gene Numbers?
>> Recent analysis of the human genome caused surprise with the number of
> genes put at one third of the number expected with some comparison made
> against some invertebrate genomes, with the yeast genome or with plant
> genomes in the lay press.
You may have been surprised. Some of us were not.
it is likely that the gene
> number in various vertebrate species will show an upper limit determined
> by the need to optimize the constraints on immune repertoire
> construction. The greater the number of "self" epitopes expressed in the
> thymic education of T-cells, the greater the number of holes created in
> the repertoire.
Only if you believe that all potentially autoreactive T cells must be
eliminated. Again, some of us do not.
Levels of non-self recognition in individuals must be
> optimal while populations need extensive polymorphism for MHC class I
> and II yet the limit on MHC loci is such that only a dozen of the
> hundreds of available MHC alleles are expressed in any individual (two
> alleles each of six class I and II genes).
Why "and yet?" Some of us have no problem with this.
So, perhaps you should consider your premises before you get too