IUBio

THE SEARCH FOR YY-CHROMOSOMAL MAN, AND SUCH...

THE MANNKEY cafe8 at smedia.com.sg
Sun Apr 14 19:45:08 EST 1996


UNDER >Y CHROMOSOME< IN NCBI'S ENTREZ SYSTEM, IN WHAT IS SUPPOSEDLY THE 
GIVEN DEFINITION OF Y CHROMOSOME, THE READOUT USES THE ACTUAL TERM 
"MAN", WHICH/WHO IS INDIRECTLY DESCRIBED AS A "MALE-HETEROGAMETIC 
SPECIES".

WHAT, QUITE PRECISELY, IS MEANT BY THAT?  HERE, EITHER OF TWO 
POSSIBILITIES:

1.  THE FEMALE OF THE SPECIES CAN ANALOGOUSLY BE DESCRIBED AS BEING 
"FEMALE-HOMOGAMETIC"...?....

2.  MAN IS AN ANDROLINEAL, NOT GYNAECOLINEAL, SPECIES, WITH A MALE 
LINEAGE THAT IS HETEROGAMETIC.  THE WORDS IN THE ABOVEMENTIONED 
INFORMATION BITE/READOUT: "...MALE-HETEROGAMETIC SPECIES IN WHICH THE 
HOMOLOGUE OF THE X CHROMOSOME HAS BEEN RETAINED" SUGGEST, WHATEVER ELSE, 
THAT THE X CHROMOSOME IS A VARIABLE, WHEREAS THE Y CHROMOSOME IS THE 
STAPLE MAINSTAY..?.....

TO PUT IT ANOTHER WAY, QUITE SIMPLY:

WOULD THE RECEIVED COMMON ENGLISH TODAY BE CORRECT TO CALL THE HUMAN 
SPECIES [SIMPLY PUT] "MAN", AS AGAINST "WOMAN"?  DO, FOR EXAMPLE, THE 
FEMINISTS HAVE A CASE AGAINST ENGLISH IN TERMS OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS 
AND SUCH, OR DOES THE CURRENT LOCAL SCIENCE SUPPORT ENGLISH'S VIEW AND 
COMMON NAME FOR THE SPECIES?

CHINESE [MANDARIN, HANYU], FOR EXAMPLE, SAYS "REN" [COMMONLY TRANSLATED 
BY THE CHINESE THEMSELVES AS "PEOPLE"; SIMPLY, "HUMAN"], AND "RENLEI" 
["HUMAN SPECIES", "MAN,KIND, MAN WITH THE CAPITAL M", LITERALLY, QUITE 
SIMPLY, "PEOPLE KIND"]...

SO, JUST WHAT QUITE PRECISELY IS MEANT BY SAYING MAN IS A 
"MALE-HETEROGAMETIC SPECIES"?  IS THE SPECIES SIMPLY "HUMAN", WITH 
INDETERMINATE SEX [BY CHROMOSOMAL/GAMETIC/WHATEVER GAUGE], BETTER 
[SCIENTIFICALLY SPEAKING] NAMED "THE HUMAN SPECIES", "HUMANUS [NOT HOMO] 
SAPIENS SAPIENS", COLLOQUIALLY AND COMMONLY, "HUMANS", "HUMAN BEINGS", 
IN A WORD, AFTER THE CHINESE LANGUAGE: "PEOPLE"?  OR, IS ENGLISH MORE 
CORRECT, AFTER ALL, IN NAMING THE SPECIES, IN A WORD: "MAN"?

JUST WHAT ARE YOU SAYING?

MY SECOND ENQUIRY IS THIS:

FIRST, THE PUZZLE:

SO, THERE ARE XY, XXY, XYY...EVEN XX MALE.  BUT, WHY SIMPLY NO YY MALE? 
 [AM I, STILL, CORRECT?]

THE "NORMAL" XY MALE OF THE HUMAN SPECIES IN THIS HISTORICAL LITTLE 
WORLD TODAY IS, TO THE MANNKEY, A HERMAPHRODITE.

FROM THE REFERENCE TO WHAT "MALE-HETEROGAMETIC SPECIES", THE MANNKEY 
INFERS:

1.  HOMOSEXUAL/HOMOGAMETIC = FEMALE [?]
     HETEROSEXUAL/HETEROGAMETIC = MALE [?]

2.  HETEROSEXUAL = HERMAPHRODITIC [MANNKEY'S VIEW IN ALL THESE HELLS 
FOREVER[?]]

3.  HOMOSEXUAL = MALE = YY-CHROMOSOMAL HOMOGAMETIC = [TRUE] [FULL] MALE 
[?]

4.  HETEROSEXUAL/HETEROGAMETIC = HE-MALE [?]...

HENCE, THE QUERY:

ANYBODY OUT THERE IN THE FIELD,S, THAT YOU MIGHT KNOW OF, WHO MIGHT BE 
OF ASSISTANCE, PURSUING THIS LINE OF INQUIRY, -- THE QUESTION OF, 
QUEST/SEARCH FOR

THE HUMAN YY-CHROMOSOMAL MALE, OR
YY-CHROMOSOMAL MAN, HOMO SAPIENS HOMOSEXUALIS, THE LATERALINEAL SPECIES 
TO HOMO SAPIENS SAPIENS?

THERE IS, FOR EXAMPLE, IN THE NEWSGROUP SCI.BIO.EVOLUTION QUITE AN 
INTRIGUING HEADER READING [SOMETHING LIKE]: "X CHROMOSOME MUTATION 
YIELDING Y CHROMOSOME", POSTED BY SOME JOHN LEEDY, WHO IS ONLY LOOKING 
FOR INFORMATION FOR HIS CLASS PROJECT OR SOMETHING.

IF YOU ALREADY HAVE INFORMATION YOURSELF,VES ON THIS QUERY, THAT TOO 
WOULD BE APPRECIATED.

MEMORY SERVES ABOUT HOMO SAPIENS HOMOSEXUALIS, OR YY-CHROMOSOMAL MAN, 
THE GROUP OR SPECIES, BEING IN AN AREA OF LIFE BORDERING AND PARALLEL 
YOU MIGHT SAY TO BUT NOT EXACTLY IN THIS HISTORICAL LITTLE WORLD.  
PRESENT WISDOM SAYS SUCH A GROUP OR SPECIES CANNOT THRIVE ON MOTHER 
EARTH, IN THE PRESENT ENVIRONMENT DESCRIBED BY THE BBC IN ONE OF ITS 
HORIZON DOCUMENTARIES AS "A SEA OF ESTROGEN".

THEN, MEMORY CAN GO ONLY SO FAR.  WHAT'S NEW?  WHAT'S FOR THIS 
BOTTOMLINE TRAIL OUT?  W-H-A-T?
MY THIRD AND FINAL ENQUIRY IS RELATED TO THE ABOVE TWO:

DO XY MALE, XXY MALE, XYY MALE...AND EVEN XX MALE GET, IN EFFECT, TO BE 
DIFFERENT KINDS OR TYPES OF MALE SEXUALITY, SEX AND OR GENDER -- AT 
LEAST, IN TERMS OF CHROMOSOMAL/GAMETIC/GENETIC MAKEUP?

YOU START WITH THE HUMAN FOETUS, WHICH, IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN, IS, SIMPLY 
PUT, SEXUALLY INDETERMINATE, ITS GONADS CAN GO EITHER WAY -- TO DEVELOP 
INTO MALE [AND?] OR FEMALE ORGANS.  WHAT DOES THE LOCAL SCIENCE REALLY 
SAY FOR A HUMAN AT THIS STAGE OF ITS PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT IN TERMS OF 
ITS/HER/HIS SEX: INDETERMINATE IS TOO VAGUE, IS IT/SHE/HE ACTUALLY, AT 
LEAST AT SOME DETERMINED POINT/STAGE, HERMAPHRODITIC, EVEN A TRUE 
HERMAPHRODITE?, THEN AGAIN, NOT JUST HERMAPHRODITIC/ANDROGYNOUS AND OR 
ASEXUAL, -- WHAT DOES INDEED COME FROM/WITH THE EGG-FERTILIZING 
PROCESS/TECHNOLOGY?, -- OR, DOES THE LOCAL SCIENCE SIMPLY SAY GONADIC, 
IF ANY GONADS AT ALL HAVE DEVELOPED AND OR COULD BE DETECTED YET?  WHAT 
MANNER "MALE" SEX,UALITY,IES HERE?
YOU GO ON TO THE PRE-PUBERTAL YOUNG BOY WHOSE VOICE HASN'T BROKEN YET, 
AND YOU KNOW, OR DOES ONE REALLY KNOW?, THAT HE IS NOT THAT FAR FROM A 
"MALE" CHILD/PERSON WHOSE TESTES/TESTICALS HAVE NOT FULLY DESCENDED.  
SO, AGAIN, WHAT MANNER "MALE" [SEX/SEXUALITY/GENDER]?
QUITE SIMPLY, IF YOU JUST GET DIRECTLY ON TO THE EPHOEBE [SAY, AN 
EIGHTEEN-YEAR-OLD YOUNG "MALE"], AND YOU MIGHT AGREE THAT HE REPRESENTS 
SOMETHING OF A QUICK[,ENING]-CRUX BETWEEN MALE AND FEMALE, AT LEAST ON 
THE MALE SIDE OF THINGS, OR IS IT ON THE FEMALE SIDE OF THINGS?.  
SEX,U,OPSCHYOSOCIOPHYSICALLY THE EPHOEBE, NOT BEING THE SAME AS A 
[FULLGROWN] MAN, CAN BE AND IS QUITE EASILY DISTINGUISHED FROM 
[FULLGROWN] MEN.  SO IN, WHAT, SIXTEENTH CENTURY JAPAN AND ENGLAND, FOR 
EXAMPLE, [FULLGROWN] MEN COULD WITHOUT SOCIETAL PREJUDICE QUITE FREELY 
HAVE SEXUAL RELATIONS WITH EPHOEBES [BOYS/YOUTHS], WHO WERE LOOKED ON BY 
THE THEN SOCIETY AS BELONGING WITH THE WOMENFOLK, IN TERMS OF 
SEX,U,OSOCIAL/SOCIOSEXUAL STATUS.  SO, YET AGAIN, AND HERE, TO CUT THE 
CRUD QUITE IN THE QUICK, WHAT MANNER "MALE" SEX/SEXUALITY/GENDER?  IF 
THE LOCAL SCIENCE CAN BE MORE EXPLICIT IN 
DESCRIBING/DEFINING/DELINEATING WHAT THE MANNKEY CALLS, IF ONLY THE 
NONCE, THE EPHOEBIC SEX,UALITY, SAY, FOR STARTERS, IN TERMS OF, IF NOT 
CHROMOSOMAL MUTATION AND SUCH, COMMONLY PUT, THE LEVEL,S, QUALITY,IES 
AND OR TYPE,S OF TESTOSTERONE/ANDROGEN [,EVEN SKIN/HAIR/EYE COLOUR,S?] 
AND SPERM [CELLS]...  MEMORY SERVES, FOR EXAMPLE, ABOUT THOSE 
[PREMIUM/FIGHTER/HE-MALE TYPES] WHOSE SPERMS HAVE TRIANGULAR HEADS, 
MANNKEY'S HAVING ELLIPTICAL HEADS, OTHERS' YET, ROUND HEADS, ETC.,.... 
..
CHINESE [MANDARIN/HANYU], FOR EXAMPLE, HAS [WORDS FOR], RECOGNIZES FIVE 
TYPES OF MALE SEXUALITIES [THERE ARE ALSO FIVE CORRESPONDING FEMALE 
CORRELATES, BUT THAT'S ANOTHER STORY], NAMELY [IF I'VE GOT IT ALL 
RIGHT]:

YANG [MALE COSMIC PRINCIPLE/ELEMENT/FORCE]; GONG [LORD-TYPE]; XIONG 
[WARRIOR-TYPE]; HAN [HERO]; AND NAN [MAN].

THEN, THE MANNKEY INVENTS "TUI" [FIRST TONE] FOR "AN WHAT MOTLEY BAND 
ONLY", THE GROUP/THOSE CLAIMING TO BE SOMETHING OF A "SUPERIOR WINNER 
CLASS" OR "PREMIUM", ESPECIALLY IN THE OLD, DU, HELLS, AND SUCH.  THE 
IDEOGRAPH BEGINS ON THE LEFT WITH THE SPIRIT RADICAL, HAS THE CHARACTER 
FOR WOMAN WEDGED IN THE MIDDLE, AND ENDS WITH THE CHARACTER FOR IT ON 
THE RIGHT.  SO, IT'S NOT "TA" [HE], OR "YI" [SHE], OR "TUO" [IT], BUT 
SOMETHING UNIQUE AND OTHERWISE UNPLACED AND UNPLACEABLE; IT MAY BE, YET 
IS NOT SO SIMPLE,ISTICALLY, HERMAPHRODITIC; IT'S SUPPOSED TO NAME WHAT 
MAY QUITE BE UNNAMEABLE, WHAT THEIR SEX,UALITY,IES AS IT/THEY APPEAR TO, 
AND OR IMPACT ON, AND OR IMPRESS UPON THE MANNKEY.  HENCE "TUI".  
HOWEVER, THIS COINED IDEOGRAPH/WORD REFERS MORE TO THE CHINESE[-TYPE] 
SEGMENT OF SUCH "PREMIUM" GROUPS.

IN ENGLISH, ALL THAT COMES SO FAR, APART FROM THE TENTATIVE BROACH ON 
"EPHOEBIC" ABOVE, -- AND SUCH DISTINCTIONS AS MASCULINE, VIRILE [Cf. THE 
"VIRIOCRACY" OF PAPUA NEW GUINEAN TRIBES, RE: HERDT, ET AL.], MACHO,...; 
THEN, STUD[LIKE], HUCKSTER, [EVEN, FROM YESTERHELLS, 
ENGINEER,-TYPE,S?]...WHATEVER -- ARE:

1.  [THE UNQUALIFIED][THE LAME, DUMB] MALE [THAT I/MANNKEY AM] [THAT 
NOBODY WANTS];
2.  [THE QUALIFIED][AMERICAN,-TYPE] HE-MALE [THAT EVERYBODY APPARENTLY 
LOOKS FOR AND TO];
3.  [THE QUALIFIED][CHINESE,-TYPE][JAPANESE,-TYPE]PHI-MALE [THE 
GRADATIONS, BY SIMPLE,ISTIC, CURRENT MANNKEY COUNTS, RANGE FROM USING, 
INCLUDING WHATEVER IT CONNOTES, THE ACTUAL GREEK LETTER PHI, PRONOUNCED 
P'EE, PFEE, TO FEE, TO THE COMMONLY SPELT, IN ENGLISH ROMAN LETTERS, 
PHIMALE TO, SIMPLY, FEEMALE: HENCE: [BY SOUND BUT WRITTEN WITH THE 
ACTUAL GREEK LETTER PHI] P'EEMALE, PFEEMALE, FEEMALE; [BY SOUND AND 
WRITTEN/SPELT, WITH ENGLISH ROMAN LETTERS, PHIMALE], AGAIN, P'EEMALE, 
PFEEMALE, FEEMALE; ETC.][WHAT INTERMEDIATE SEX,UALITY,IES IN THE GAMUT 
FROM UNQUALIFIED MALE THROUGH ALL MANNER OF QUALIFIED MALE, INCLUDING 
HE-MALE, THROUGH TO:];
4.  [THE UNQUALIFIED] FEMALE.

BEYOND THIS,  THE MANNKEY LOOKS TO DU FOR WHAT MORE MALE THAN MALE, ALL 
THE WAY, ALL' DEN WEG, WAS ALLE, FOR WHAT IS REALLY GOOD AND DESIRABLE, 
WHAT IS [ALREADY THERE] AND SHOULD BE -- NOT THE OTHER WAY, TO THE 
HE-MALE, WHO/WHICH IS A QUALIFIED MALE AND LESS MALE THAN MALE, AT LEAST 
BY THE MANNKEY'S COUNT.

THERE IS SOMETHING OF A Y OR LAMBDA KIND OF FIGURE [OF 
CONCEPTUALIZATION], WHERE THE LONG LIMB REFERS TO WHAT,EVER MALE 
SEX,UALITY,IES THERE MAY BE OUT THERE, WHERE IT'S ALL SUPPOSED TO BE 
MANFORMS ONLY, AND WHERE [THE DING-DONG TWIXT THE TWAIN ON] THE 
MALE-FEMALE DICHOTOMY DOES NOT OBTAIN AND IS ABSOLUTELY, OR JUST ABOUT 
ABSOLUTELY, IRRELEVANT.  WHAT ACTUALLY OBTAINS ON THIS LONGER LIMB, 
APART FROM WHAT IS BRIEFLY MENTIONED HERE, WHAT MYRIAD, INFINITE[?] 
[VARIETIES, NUANCES, TYPES OF] MALE SEX,UALITY,IES, WHAT ASSFUCKING SEX, 
AND ALL, IS IF ONLY CURRENTLY BEYOND THE MANNKEY... . ..
THE SHORTER LIMB LEADS DIRECTLY TO THE MALE-FEMALE DICHOTOMY, WHAT 
[IRRELEVANT, TANGENTIAL] LOGICAL EXTREME/END, WHAT COUGHING OUT, ON WHAT 
BOTTOMLINE, WHAT COMPUTER PRINTOUT, OF WHAT'S FOR REAL AFTER ALL IN 
TERMS OF, WHATEVER ELSE, WHAT ASSFUCKING SEX THERE IS OUT THERE. THIS 
MALE-FEMALE DICHOTOMY, IN ALL THE [ASSFUCKING] [CUNTFUCKING] SEX THERE 
IS HERE, OUT THERE AND EVERYWHERE, IF MEMORY SERVES ARIGHT, IS, 
GENERALLY SPEAKING, CONFINED TO SUCH LIFE?/REALITY? AREAS AS THIS LITTLE 
WORLD, WHAT RUBBISH DUMP...WHAT'S FOR REAL AFTER ALL?...... . . 
...SUPPOSEDLY, SUCH A TINY LITTLE PART OF THE OVERALL PERSPECTIVE OUT 
THERE [WAY BEYOND THIS LITTLE WORLD, WAY, WAY, WAY BEYOND THIS DARKENED 
UNIVERSE, AND ALL, ALL THE WAY, ALL' DEN WEG, WAS ALLE] IT/THEY [SUCH 
LIFE?/REALITY? AREAS OF LIFE/ASSFUCKING, SEX/REALITY...] IS/ARE, 
SIMPLE,ISTICALLY PUT, HARDLY A DROP IN THE OCEAN...  BUT, I HAVEN'T 
ACTUALLY SEEN THE WHOLE PICTURE YET, -- ALL, 100%, OF ALL THERE IS OUT 
THERE, IN HERE, ETC., SO,
I/MANNKEY DON'T KNOW...WAS ALLE SEHEN NICHT KO"NNEN, CAN'T SEE, DON'T 
KNOW... . . .

THEN, OF COURSE, -- AT A LOWER LEVEL OF PLAY AND RELEVANCE -- THERE ARE 
ANGELS, DEVILS, DEMONS, GODS, DEMON-GODS, SHEN, REAL SHEN, ALL MANNER OF 
SPIRIT,S, THE CLASSIC,AL,S, THE MYTHIC,AL,S, MYTHOLOGIC,AL,S, 
LEGENDARIES, WHAT HEROES, WARRIORS, LORDS, WARLORDS [CONSTITUTING THE 
LOFT CONNECTION AS AGAINST THE DARWINIAN MUD CONNECTION, WHICH LEADS TO 
THE APE AND TREESHREW AND SUCH, WHAT HOMO ERECTUS AND ALL], IN THE SPACE 
AGE, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE, KLINGONS[?], AND SO ON?, -- ALL, SIMPLY PUT, 
MANFORMS [EXCEPT, PERHAPS, WHAT KLINGONS?].  LIKE, ANGELS, FOR EXAMPLE, 
BEING SPIRIT,S, ARE FORMLESS, BUT HABITUALLY, USUALLY, ASSUME THE FORM 
OF YOUNG MEN, SIMPLY PUT.  YET YOU CAN'T CALL THEM, AND ALL SUCH OTHERS, 
MEN, -- IF ONLY BECAUSE YOU THEN SPOIL THEIR, ASSFUCKING, SEX FOR THEM. 
 THEY SHUN THE NAME OF "MEN".  IT'S JUST NOT THEY/THEM, THEIR NATURE, 
THEIR STYLE, AND OR THEIR [,KIND OF ASSFUCKING,] SEX...

AT A HIGHER LEVEL OF PLAY AND RELEVANCE, EVEN PERTINENCE, THERE ARE SUCH 
AS THE SEXI [SINGULAR, SEXUS, LIKE, HIS ENGLISH MAJESTY, WHAT ONE SEXUS 
BEYOND MY PALE], MAYBE WINNERS....MANNKEY DON'T KNOW WHAT ALL SUCH/THEY 
CALL THEMSELVES, --  SO MANY THINGS ACCORDING TO SUCH 
LIFE?/REALITY,IES?, LIKE ASSFUCKING SEX, DEFY BEING WORDED AND OR NAMED 
-- WHAT COMES MY WAY, TO DATE, TO NONCE, UPON THE UGLY TRUTH ABOUT DU, 
AND SUCH, IS QUITE SIMPLY: "AN WHAT MOTLEY BAND ONLY", WHAT "PREMIUM", 
AS NIANG, WOULD, PUT IT FOR NON-DU QUARTERS, WHAT, IF YOU SO TAKE, "THE 
ELITE", IN YOUR PARLANCE, TO YOU IN THIS HISTORICAL LITTLE WORLD [, 
THOUGH IT DOESN'T NECESSARILY MEAN YOUR PREPPY SORT,S]...SUCH, LIKEWISE, 
BUT EVEN/EVER MORE SO, ABHOR/SHUN BEING CALLED "MEN" AND OR "MAN", 
WHICH/WHO, ACCORDING TO THE CHINESE [HANYU] IDEOGRAPH, IS THE STRENGTH 
THAT CARRIES THE FIELD... ...

BUT, SO MANNKEY DISCERNS, IF CURRENTLY, YET AGAIN [?],
DEN WEG ENTLANG, ALONG THE WAY,
ON THE DU SIDE OF THINGS, SIMPLE,ISTICALLY PUT,
COURTESY OF DU,
IRRELEVANTLY, WHATEVER,
IF/WHEN YOU ASSUME THE MANFORM  [WHAT OTHER FORM WOULD YOU CALL IT?], 
YOU PAY MAN HIS DUES, -- EVEN IF MAN KNOCKS HIS HEAD AGAINST A LOW 
CEILING, AND, MAN IS NOT ENOUGH, IT HAS TO BE DU, THEN YOU GET IT 
ALL......

STEPPING OFF THE SHOULDER OF THE AMERICAN HE-MALE, YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO 
GET BEYOND TO SOMETHING ELSE THAT IS BEYOND THE AMERICAN THING BUT YET 
STILL SOMETHING LIKE THE HE-MALE SORT OF THING.  

MEMORY AND SEEING HAVE SERVED ONLY THUS FAR, FOR WHAT SEX,UALITY,IES 
THERE MAY BE OUT THERE... . . .

TO THE MANNKEY, THE [AMERICAN] HE-MALE IS A QUALIFIED MALE, NEXT-OF-SKIN 
TO SHE-MALE, FEMALE.  [SO I/MANNKEY AM STUBBORN.   DU, BUDGE DU, WAS 
ALLE.  WHAT DO I KNOW?  WHAT DO I CARE?]  SO, THE AMERICAN[-TYPE] 
HE-MALE IS SOMETHING LIKE:

S/HE [QUITE SIMPLY, AT BEST SOMETHING OF A SHE-HE] [AT LEAST, TO THE 
MANNKEY],

WHEREAS THE CHINESE[-TYPE] OF "TUI" SEX,UALITY,IES, WOULD, AT LEAST 
CORRELATIVELY SPEAKING, BE SOMETHING LIKE:

H/S,HE, OR
H/SHE, OR
H/S/E [PRONOUNCED LIKE THE HANYU [PINYIN] "XI" [OR, BY THE WADE-GILES 
(SYSTEM OF ROMANIZATION) STILL USED IN TAIWAN, "HSI"], OR THE SOFT "CH" 
OPTION IN GERMAN "CHI-NESISCH", IN SHORT, SOMETHING OF A HESHE].

IF ONLY BY THE GERMAN COUNT, WHEREBY WHAT ENDS THE WORD IS THE OPERATIVE 
SUBSTANTIVE THAT DECIDES THE GRAMMATICAL DECLENSION, TWIXT THE TWAIN, 
THE AMERICAN[-TYPE] HE-MALE IS MORE THE HE, AND THE CHINESE[-TYPE] 
[JAPANESE,-TYPE] "TUI" SEX,UALITY,IES IS MORE THE SHE.  HENCE, WHATEVER 
ELSE, THE LINE IN [MY] ODE TO ENGLISH, THE NEVER ENDING POEM [BUT SEE, 
AT REC.ARTS.POEMS, IF IT'S STILL THERE]:

>>AND CHINA SHALL AMERICA FOR HUSBAND TAKE<<

IF ENGLISH REGRESSES TO FINNISH EXTENTS, AND SIMPLY SAYS <HA"N> FOR HE 
AND OR SHE [EVEN IF NOT FOR IT AS WELL], THEN, YOU SEE, APART FROM 
SEXIST CONSIDERATIONS AND SUCH, JUST WHAT ARE YOU GETTING, IN TERMS OF 
SEX,UALITY,IES [JUST WHAT ARE YOU FUCKING?, IF YOU WILL PLEASE ALLOW ME 
TO CALL A SPADE A SPADE] -- LET ALONE, SCIENTIFICALLY SPEAKING?

IF [THE LOCAL] SCIENCE CAN SEE, TELL AND EXPLAIN WHAT GOES ON OR HAPPENS 
WHEN THE WHEELS OF THE TRAIN TURN, WELL AND GOOD, ALTHOUGH IT'S THE 
DRIVER OF THE TRAIN THAT IS TAKING THE TRAIN PLACES...

WOULD YOU BE ABLE TO ASSIST ME, IN ANY WAY WHATEVER, IN TRACING MALE 
SEX,UALITY,IES, -- AT LEAST WHAT COMES AND OR OBTAINS AND OR IS 
DISCERNIBLE IN THESE IMMEDIATE QUARTERS, WHAT THIS HISTORICAL LITTLE 
WORLD, THIS RUBBISH DUMP,...WHAT'S FOR REAL AFTER ALL?... . . . . . . . 
.

I DON'T HAVE A COMPUTER OF MY OWN OR AN INTERNET ACCOUNT.  I USE PUBLIC 
ACCESS FACILITIES AT LIBRARIES AND CYBERCAFES.  IF YOU ARE AT ALL 
WILLING TO ENTERTAIN MY QUERIES AND REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION AND WOULD 
LIKE TO SEND ME A REPLY, YOU MAY DROP ME A LINE AT MY RESIDENTIAL POSTAL 
ADDRESS: MY ID PARTICULARS BELOW.

ANY SECURITY RISK,S RESULTING FROM PUBLISHING MY ID PARTICULARS AND 
RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS, QUITE FRANKLY AND SIMPLY, -- UNLESS ALL HELL REALLY 
BREAKS OUT, LIKE IF THE EARTH WERE TO SPLIT INTO TWO OR SOMETHING -- 
WOULD BE THE LEAST OF MY PROBLEMS.  I'M ALREADY CLOSE TO DEATH, -- WHAT 
HEART CONDITION, AND ALL -- AND ALL HELL IS WAITING FOR ME, WHAT'S WORSE 
THAN HELL, AND ALL...

I'M JUST HOPING, THIS HERE, WHAT MANNKEY, WHAT DU, WAS ALLE, IS THE LAST 
SHIP OUT OF HELL, --

DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU... . . .

DU [YOU-HOO]
DU... . . .

DU
HIER OLEDY
WAS ALLE?

HIER OLEDY

THANK YOU.


SINCERELY


THE MANNKEY


SINGAPORE NATIONAL REGISTRATION CARD NO.: S0016225F
SINGAPORE NRIC NAME: TUA PEK SIWANG
SEX: MALE
AGE: 45+
OCCUPATIONAL STATUS: FREEMAN
RESIDENCE: 130 PASIR RIS ST 11 #07-291
	            SINGAPORE 510130



More information about the Gen-link mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net