sma wrote:
> As for your comment "where are the facts", refer to my original
> comment. Since your side lost it is your responsibility to provide
> compelling new evidence that is scientifically sound (Note!!) if you
> want to reopen the debate. If you think that your side didn't lose I
> think I should point out that I am a scientist (PhD) and I have NEVER
> even met another scientist who holds to the creationist view nor have
> I ever encountered any papers in the journals I read that support the
> creationist hypothesis. Kinda makes you think that they are a little
> thin on the ground, doesn't it. Since we are talking about science and
> not belief the winning side is the one which commands the respect of
> the scientific community, and they clearly think that your side is out
> to lunch.
oh, that hurts.
interesting thing though: there are some (perhaps half a dozen) PhDs out their
who represent the creationist believe. Its them that the creationists kling
to. Every half true statement is gobbled up. I always thought of changing
sides to earn a fast buck if need be. But then again, I'm simply not
opportunistic enough.
Clemens Suter-Crazzolara, PhD
