Alex Vange wrote:
> But you did ignore what I wrote, which was verse 24 is about a case of
> a damsel that doesn't cry out about it, which means that in that culture
> thousands of years ago a damsel might not object too much to the situation.
I didn't ignore your drivel. Deu 22:24 refers to a women who is PLEDGED
TO be married. A women, who is NOT PLEDGED TO BE MARRIED, even if she
cries out for help, is still married off to her rapist (Deu 22:28)
> They might not object as much as in todays culture and they were not
> Jews.
>> The chosen people are the White people, not the Jews. Jews are
> mostly Khazars and Edomites. These are races that adopted the religion of
> Judaism and now they falsely claim to be Israelites.
it must gall you that the Nazis lost war.
Actually "white" people were worshipping Banshees and Oster the fertiliy
goddess before they came across monotheism, but let me humor you, and
assume that you are right.
Are you saying that white people like to raped?
> This means the real Israelites converted to Christianity. This
> explains why Europe became known as Christendom.
Actually the existence of the Roman empire explains why Europe became
Christian.
> "to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy:- be (dyed,
> made) red (ruddy)."
Chinese people are also ruddy, gee, I guess Adam is Chinese
> The Bible tells us that the Jews are imposters.
>> Revelation 2:9 "I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and
> are not, but are the synagogue of Satan."
You right, the Bible is a hated-filled fairy tale book designed to
appease the ignorant.
But you are wrong. This verse implies that there are "true" Jews
you are not it.
> No, it is implied that this would not be the case and that the culture
> was much different thousands of years ago.
>> > what a 'moral law' from a 'moral god'
> >
> Someone would have to support a damsel that no one would marry in that
> culture.
ahh, your 'god' capitualtes on issues morals, because the society didn't
"like it", what a wimp.
> True, but what I wrote was that if the point was that the damsel had
> to be supported then we could make the guilty man pay, like people pay
> alimony today. But since the damsel does not need to be supported today we
> should execute the guilty man as it says in verse 25.
more self-serving rationaliztion.
That's right, "god" writes a law that encourages domestic violence.
> You ignore the fact that the rapist in verse 25 is to be put to death.
> This is the punishment in general.
> But in that culture no man would marry a damsel who was not a virgin so the
> damsel had to be supported somehow. I agree that that was a bad part of the
> culture but it was the way things were.
you ignore your own bible. It refers to GIRLS WHO ARE PLEDGED TO BE
MARRIED.
let me repeat that for that SLOW Aryan mind of yours.
Deu 22:25 REFERS TO GIRLS WHO ARE PLEDGED TO BE MARRIED.
Girls who are NOT pledged are married off to her rapist (deu 22:28)
Yang
#28
