In Article <359C3004.2733 at mx3.redestb.es>, laosan at mx3.redestb.es wrote:
>From: laosan at mx3.redestb.es>Newsgroups:
soc.history,sci.econ,soc.history.war,soc.history.science,talk.politics.misc,
alt.sci.sociology,sci.bio,sci.bio.misc,bionet.general,
Dear Dr. Laosan,
Your pregnant choice of newsgroups suggests me that you are a student
of the well-renowned Prof. Archimdes Plutonium of
Dartmouth University.
[most of the NGs have been removed]
>Subject: soc.history, sci.econ, soc.history.war, soc.history.science,
talk.politics.misc, alt.sci.sociology, BIOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
>Date: Fri, 03 Jul 1998 01:12:36 +0000
>I am a scientist, which has developed a biological model of Economics
>and History.
>The model is based in the main laws of Complexity and social evolution,
Are you speakning of the recent outstanding Sociologycal Thermodynamics Theory
due to Prof. Plutonium ?
>fields in which I am specialized. It analyzes the Industrial
>r=evolution, as a process of evolution of 'metal-machines', that are
>displacing Life, and creating a new ecosystem different from the Human
>Earth - the "Metalearth'.
Is 231Pu a metal? What is the relation between the Plutonium Atom Totality and
Metalearth?
>>A biological model of economics:
>The model has 2 clear advantages over both, the Smith-based systems of
Joe Smith?
>Economics [capitalism] and the Marx-based systems:
Groucho Marx?
>>- It explains in scientific terms the nature and laws of Economics.
>Since it deduces and harmonizes those laws from established laws of
>physical sciences, evolution, and complexity. A fact that gives the
Are you speaking of the physical complex leading to the evolution toward
Brain Locuses?
>model wider and sounder scientific basis than Marxist or Capitalist
>models. And so it integrates for the first time Economical sciences
>within the wider frame of biological sciences.
>- It relates closely the economical and historical process, which become
>integrated in a single theory, without any jump of 'quality', since the
Excuse me, but Prof. Plutonium proved that you cannot avoid "jumps of
quality" as a consequence of Quantum Mechanics.
>first historical ages of man.
>>And an unavoidable political conclusion:
>- It proves that the political thesis of Ecologism and Socialism are
>right: creditation and defense of life, human goods, and lesser
>technological cultures - the bulk of human population - against
>uncontrolled expansion and creditation of machines, reproduced and
>evolved by companies .
>Why?
As a consequence of Bell Inequality of Quantum Mechanics, of course
>Because a biological expansion of the "Metalearth" would be 'menacing'
Excuse me, I understand the notion of metaphysics, because I now what is
physics . But I am unable to grasp the notion of meatlearth, because I don't
understand what is "learth"
>not only the survival of animal life, but also the survival of human
>life.
and even of Plutonium Atom Totality.
>The industrial r=evolution is not only growth of human welfare, but
Ar=e you sur=e of the corr=ectness of your r=emarks?
>mainly evolution of human functions and ecosystems into machine forms
>and ecosystems. So we substitute legs for cars, brains for computers,
Iodine atoms (atomic number 53) for Plutonium Atom,
>arms for cranes, etc, creating maxi-replicas of human functions in forms
>of metal, of higher complexity, and physical resistance.
>In such biological model, the Industrial R=evolution, can be understood
>in 3 ages:
>I Horizon: [+XVIII, XIX Century]: Creation of 'Metal-bodies' [gunboats,
>railroads].
>II Horizon: [XX C.]: Creation of 'metalminds' [Radio-ears, TV-eyes, and
>Chips=Metal brains].
>III Horizon: Fusion of both components, in 'sentient machines' or
>'animetals' [XXI Century].
IV Horizon: Plutonium Atom Totality
>This 3rd age that now starts with the first autonomous robots, might
>cause our extinction, as previous radiations of species of higher
>informative and energetic power caused massive extinctions in the past.
>In the evolution of the Earth when a new, efficient specie of
>informative+body organs is completed, she radiates in the previous
>ecosystem, displacing weaker species, that become extinct, directly or
>indirectly by the new radiation [that hunts them or expels them from its
>vital space]. So the arrival of eyes, with cephalopods, probably extinct
>90% of blind species, in the Cambric. The arrival of complex neural
You are misspelling Cambridge. Are you from Oxford, by chance?
>systems in mammals, probably caused the extinction of eggs and offspring
>of dinosaurs. In both cases the new top predator specie appeared just
>before massive extinctions took place. We could extrapolate those
>effects to future economical radiations of 'animetals' [a digital
>eye-brain + body-platform]; which extinct humans indirectly, expelling
>labor from the industrial 'ecosystem', under myths of productivity, or
>directly in wars caused by the evolution of top predator weapons. Since
>in all ages of the Industrial r=evolution the more evolved, more perfect
You are misspelling mor=e
>machines have been weapons: a 'top predator' specie designed - today
>programmed - to kill men.
>We argue the theme in depth, within the parameters of economics,
>biology, war and complexity. The result is a theory of evolutive
>radiations, now expanded to History and Economics, that explains
>economical, historical, and war cycles, with much more insight that
>present theories.
>>[1] You can find a brief account of the model in the book "Radiations of
>space-time. The extinction of man?" published by Bookmasters [250 pg.]
>info at bookmaster.com, http://www.bookmasters.com
Dear Publisher,
I have read the submitted paper by Dr. Laosan.
In my opinion the author was unable to grasp the outstanding theory by Prof.
Plutonium.
As such I am forced to suggest rejection.
Sincerely
Teo Mora (referee)
