IUBio

Fluoridation Scam

Carol S. Kopf Yesitis at gnn.com
Fri Jul 12 08:52:27 EST 1996


In article <89c4xAwZqcaL090yn at io.com> Lars Eighner wrote:
>Date:	8 Jul 1996 22:39:12 -0500
>From:	eighner at io.com (Lars Eighner)
>Subject:	Re: Fluoridation Scam
>
>In our last episode <4rrvv1$374_002 at jun.ipgnet.com>,
>Broadcast on
> 
ab.general,atl.general,aus.general,austin.general,bc.general,bionet.

genera
>l,ca.general,can.general,nz.general,ga.general,houston.general
>The lovely and talented shockme at ipgnet.com (Shock Media) wrote:
>
>>An article from the Shock Media July Issue
>>http://www.ipgnet.com/~jun/media/
>>
>>FLUORIDATION SCAM
>>
>>``Fluoridation is the greatest case of scientific fraud
>>of this century, if not of all time.``
>>[R. Carton, PHD - former scientist with the US Environmental
>>Protection Agency (EPA)]
>
>
>Gotta conserve those precious bodily fluids, huh?
>


Unfortunately, when it comes to fluoridation, it seems most people 
use the movies and commercials (look, ma - no cavities) as their 
scientific evidence to support their  beliefs. 

You know, you can't believe everything you see in the movies  or
on TV.

The fluoride that's added to water supplies is hydrofluosilicic 
acid.  It's a waste product of the phosphate fertilizer industry.  
It contains trace amounts of contaminants like lead, according to 
the American Water Works Association.

It's purpose in the late 1940's, when fluoridation started, was to 

deliver l milligram of fluoride to children up to age nine so they 

would have less tooth decay and not get any of fluoride's adverse 
side effects like dental fluorosis (white, yellow or brown 
permanently stained teeth).

So now over 60% of this country's water supplies are fluoridated  
so is most of our food supply.  Coupled with a glut of fluoride 
products on the market, dentist report in their journals that 
children have more dental fluorosis than ever.

Press releases issued from dental groups get printed verbatim 
(without question) by mainstream media that claims fluoride 
reduces tooth decay.  However, there is no science to back that 
up.

In fact, "Public Health Reports" (which is a government 
publication of the Department of Health and Human Services), 
reported in September of '95 that it's a myth that 50 percent of 
U.S. schoolchildren have never had a cavity.

Using National Institutes of Dental Research studies, the author 
says, "caries (cavities) is a serious problem even among some 
groups of toddlers, that caries experience among young children 
may not be declining and that caries experience among poulation 
subgroups varies widely."

So, your taxes pay for an unnecessary pollutant to be added to an 
increasingly contaminated water supply that many Americans avoid 
by drinking bottled water.  And it causes more adverse 
effects than beneficial (if any).  Remember fluoride isn't added 
to treat the water.  It's added to treat the people for a disease 
they may or may not have.  Fluoride is neither essential to life 
nor is it a nutrient.

If you want to have a good time, go to the movies.  If you want to 
learn about fluoride, read some books.

More info can be accessed at:

http://www.santarosa.edu/~dmontgom/fluoride.htm
http://emporium.turnpike.net/P/PDHA/health.htm

(no commie plot stuff here)


Carol S. Kopf




More information about the Bioforum mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net