>The HIV newsgroup has not really taken off. Under our regulations
>nothing will be done about that until the end of the year at which
>time the group might be put on notice of shutdown if it has not
>attracted a minimum amount of use.
>One other option, if one wants to be proactive, would be to merge it
>with bionet.virology (perhaps we specialized with HIV too soon??).
>Such a step would have to be agreeable to the discussion leader of the
>HIV group and its readership, of course.
>What do others think of this idea?
> Sincerely,
> Dave Kristofferson
It certainly would make 'biological' sense to merge HIV with virology. In
addition, the bionet.virology charter includes discussion on HIV.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert J. Coelen | phone : 09 - 389 3915
Department of Microbiology | fax : 09 - 389 2912
The University of Western Australia |
----------------------------------------------------------------------
