An issue has come up concerning who should have access to certain
aspects of the records of the Arabidopsis Stock Centers. We would
like to hear opinions from the community about the following issues.
1. The cDNA sequencing groups deposit the clones in the Ohio Center.
We anticipate that there will be more than 20,000 clones available in
the next few years. The problem with using EST clones for certain
purposes is that one cannot be certain that someone else has not
already done a particular experiment. In order to try and minimize
this problem, I think it would be best to know who else has requested
a particular EST so that one could contact the other parties to see
if there is likely to be duplication of effort. This information is
in the AIMS database and can be made available on line through AIMS
or by GOPHER access to AIMS. Are there reasons why this should not
be done? It seems to me that anyone who had a pressing need for
secrecy should simply forego the convenience of being able to order
the clone and should be obliged to PCR the clone from some suitable
2. the same argument can be made for the seed collections. Is there
any reason why all requests for a particular stock should not be
freely available via some form of electronic query?
We will be pleased to hear arguments for and against this kind of
290 Panama Street
Stanford, CA 94305