In <221604753wnr at longevb.demon.co.uk> John at longevb.demon.co.uk (John de
Rivaz) writes:
>>In article: <3ifmh7$it0 at mace.cc.purdue.edu> barani at mace.cc.purdue.edu>(Barani) writes:
>>>>>> Recently non-molecular biology postings have outnumbered
>> the ones that are relevant to this group.
>> I wish to express my opinion that bionet.molbio.ageing
>> is a newsgroup devoted to discussions on molecular
>> biological aspects only. I would recommend the discussions
>> on ethical and social issues be directed to other longevity
>> newsgroups (or we can always create a new newsgroup for that
>> purpose).
>>____________________________________________________________
Thought this was a good post and and was worth re-posting. I wish no
ill feeling toard anyone but think that many of the public posts do not
belong here. I would also encourage everyone to learn the difference
between public posts and e-mail and ask yourself before you post, does
every M.D., Ph.D or researcher in the country need to read my post or
does just the author need to read the post. E-mail is good.
Just for public information, this news group was published the the
February issue of the popular health magizine "Longevity" which could
account for many of our new readers.
