In article <mbxfd-270594152310 at macfd.biochem.nottingham.ac.uk>,
Fergus Doherty <mbxfd at unicorn.nott.ac.uk> wrote:
>In article <15498.9405270859 at mailer.leeds.ac.uk>, malcolm at GEOG.LEEDS.AC.UK>(Malcolm McMahon) wrote:
>>>>> At the moment much of the structure of our lives revolves arround the
>> inevitability of ageing. What new structures would evolve if it where
>> removed noone can say. I, for one, am looking foreward to the next
>> century and hope to see the whole of it.
>>>Would it really be desirable to live for 3-400 years? This would lead to
>an increased population, perhaps even more so if it led to more children
>spread over a longer period (child bearing period for women would be
>greater if ageing slowed?). What effect of such older people would there
>be on innovation and social change, might not such a society be dangerously
>static?
>>Fergus Doherty,
>dept. Biochemistry,
>University Medical School,
>Queen's Medical Centre,
>Nottingham NG7 2UH
>Tel: 602 709366 FAX 602 422225 Internet: mbxfd at unicorn.nott.ac.uk
INVENTION PROJECT...
THAT AGES YOU DIFFERENTLY --- so you still die at 80
but you have the body of
a 29 year old.
THIS INVENTION WOULD BE A GODSEND FOR WOMEN....
CONSIDERING ALL THE 60 YEAR OLD MD'S WHO MARRY
19 YEAR OLD WOMEN.... GRIN
GREG BUELL 303 443 6270
PO BOX 1113 BOULDER CO 80306
LIGHT YEAR CONQUEST CORP.
--
C:\dir PATH to the 10 nearest SOLAR SYSTEMS >> marries OS/2 to INTERNET
"The Light Year Conquest Corp."->>> Lovestars on their honeymoon A-BOMB
"1,001 Things You Can Invent" ->>>> You must invent gravity control !!!
FIVE POINTS IF YOU CAN NAME THE 10 NEAREST STARS TO EARTH --> GENIUS ??
